Committees, colleges and panels
The ESRC Council comprises a structure of committees that work alongside a Peer Review College and grant assessment groups and panels.
Our committees lead key aspects of our corporate strategy and oversee the development of our research and training investments. They work together to deliver our corporate objectives with an emphasis on delivering excellent social science with scientific, societal and economic impacts.
Three policy committees, each chaired by an ESRC Council member, represent the main sections of our research and training portfolio.
- Methods and Infrastructure Committee: oversees our investments in data services, surveys and research methods development, and sets policy for the management of research data and the information environment.
- Research Committee: oversees and sets policy for our research funding and investments, both managed and responsive.
- Training and Skills Committee: provides strategic direction to our efforts to improve the quality of research training for social science researchers in the UK.
These three policy committees work alongside:
- Audit Committee: provides advice on the overall effectiveness of our management procedures and internal control systems.
- Evaluation Committee : provides advice on the quality and impact of our investments and corporate strategy.
Peer Review College
Our Peer Review College members provide expert quality reviews of proposals within their areas of expertise. These reviews inform our decision-making processes.
Our Grants Delivery Group makes scientific recommendations for funding awards across responsive mode schemes (excluding annual schemes) on behalf of the policy committees. These funding decisions are informed by the recommendations of the Grant Assessment Panels (GAPs).
There are three GAPs organised around clusters of disciplines comprising 45 to 50 members in total. The role of the GAPs is to appraise applications submitted under the responsive mode schemes and classify them by grade according to procedures and criteria approved and overseen by the relevant committee.
Recommendations on annual responsive mode schemes are made by commissioning panels under delegated authority from the relevant committee. Recommendations are made direct to the executive in the case of fast-track schemes.