Send us your feedback

Thank you for your feedback. An email has been sent to the ESRC support team.

An error occured whilst sending your feedback. Please review the problems below.

The research catalogue is an archive of ESRC-funded grants and outputs. Links, files and other content will no longer be maintained or updated after April 2014.

The Informal Politics of Co-Decision: Trilogues and Early Agreements in the EU's Legislative Procedure

This project investigates a widespread yet under-studied trend in European politics: the shift of legislative decision-making from public inclusive to informal secluded arenas. Between 1999 and mid-2007 alone, 43 per cent of EU legislation was pre-agreed informally between the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers and adopted at first reading, with the legislative procedure ("co-decision") abridged or "fast-tracked" accordingly.

This development is puzzling: while co-decision was introduced to make EU decision-making more inclusive, accountable and transparent, the procedure has instead increased informalisation and seclusion from the electorate as well as rank-and-file parliamentarians. Against this backdrop, the project pursues three goals.

  1. Understand the extent and conduct of informal politics, it surveys and categorises all co-decision files from 1999 to mid-2009 and charts how the formal rules of co-decision are applied in the political praxis.
  2. Explain why fast-track legislation occurs, it derives hypotheses from rational choice and sociological institutionalism and submits them to two tests: a multivariate regression analysis of all surveyed acts and comparative case studies, based on in-depth interviews and qualitative document analysis.
  3. Evaluate the democratic consequences of fast-track legislation, it evaluates these empirical results against standards of legitimate decision-making.

Given the general trend towards informal and accelerated decision-making in domestic and global politics, the findings are relevant for scholars of Comparative Politics and International Relations; they also address a question of key strategic and normative importance for the Brussels policy-community.