Contact

Send us your feedback

Thank you for your feedback. An email has been sent to the ESRC support team.

An error occured whilst sending your feedback. Please review the problems below.

The Morality of Private War

Grant reference: RES-000-22-4042

« View grant details

Journal article details

The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory
This article argues that the use of private military and security companies (PMSCs) prompts the need for greater attention to the issue of the moral legitimacy of the military. Accordingly, it proposes a normative conception of legitimacy—the ‘Moderate Instrumentalist Approach’—that outlines the qualities that a military should possess. It then assesses the three leading ways of organizing the military according to this approach: the use of PMSCs, a conscripted force and the all-volunteer force (AVF). The paper argues that the AVF, despite some notable problems, is the most legitimate way of organising the military.
10.1177/1474885111425119
English

Primary contributor

Author James Pattison

Additional details

11
2
Yes
1474-8851
SAGE Publications
01 August 2012
131-154
London
Post-print
European journal of political theory

Cite this outcome

Harvard

Pattison, James (2012) The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory. European journal of political theory. 11 (2), pp. 131-154 London: SAGE Publications.

Vancouver

Pattison James. The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory. European journal of political theory 2012; 11 (2): 131-154.